The Dangers of AI-Generated Fiction: Archibald's Story (2025)

Imagine waking up one day to find that the internet, once a reliable mirror of reality, is now scribbling fictional tales about your life—stories that never happened, controversies that never erupted, all spun by an invisible digital ghost. That's the unsettling truth I've discovered, and it's a wake-up call for us all. But here's where it gets controversial: What if the technology we're celebrating as progress is silently erasing our shared history, rewriting personal narratives, and concentrating power in ways that make Big Brother look like child's play?

This piece is an opinion column penned by a real human being, not some algorithm churning out prose. Let's dive into my eerie encounter with artificial intelligence (AI), starting from the top. Geoffrey Hinton, often hailed as the 'Godfather of AI,' recently warned that there's a staggering one-in-five chance that AI could wipe out humanity within the next 30 years. You can read his chilling interview here (http://theguardian.com/technology/2024/dec/27/godfather-of-ai-raises-odds-of-the-technology-wiping-out-humanity-over-next-30-years). I totally get his dread—I'm right there with him. But while Hinton gazes anxiously toward the future of AI, my concerns are rooted in the present: How AI is distorting our past, fabricating events that never occurred, and messing with our grasp on what's real.

You see, every now and then, I do a quick search on Google for my own name. It's always a bit nauseating—who knows what digital footprints you'll uncover? But it's been a handy shortcut to track down my old articles and columns. Or at least, it used to be. Lately, though, when I punch in my name, I'm greeted not by facts, but by invented narratives. Allow me to rewind and explain from the start.

Back in 2009, I penned a column that, let's face it, wasn't my finest hour. It was about unexpected twists in the news cycle, and I kicked it off with a personal, insider quip about my wife, Alecia. We'd stumbled upon a vintage photo of her as a 7-year-old girl, reluctantly thrust into a beauty pageant called 'Little Miss Confederacy' in Montgomery. Picture this: a sweet child in a dainty white dress handmade by her grandmother, sporting a sash labeled 'Miss Alabama Confederacy,' and flashing a smile that screamed discomfort. I found it uproariously funny because Alecia is the epitome of someone who'd never dream of entering a pageant or embracing symbols of the Old South. So, I tossed in a couple of cheeky lines, like, 'Great Jefferson Davis' Ghost! Could my fiercely egalitarian wife truly be part JonBenet Ramsey and part flagbearer for those not-so-glorious bygone eras?'

Folks didn't see the humor. For weeks, strangers in the grocery store would corner Alecia to reassure her that I was the real jerk. But that was the extent of the fallout—nothing more, nothing less. Fast-forward to this month, when Alecia wanted to write about that awkward pageant experience. She hunted for the photo, and I turned to Google to assist.

I typed in 'John Archibald' and 'Little Miss Confederacy.' What surfaced was nothing short of mind-blowing: an AI-generated summary claiming that the reference to Little Miss Confederacy tied back to a 2018 scandal where I, a columnist for AL.com, supposedly criticized a high school beauty pageant entrant for her social media post glorifying the Confederacy. The story claimed the article—which doesn't exist—targeted a teen named Annie Johnson (someone I've never mentioned and can't locate any info on) who was in the Miss Alabama pageant (which, by the way, requires participants to be at least 18).

Absolutely none of this transpired. Yet, the AI narrative ramps up. It asserted that this nonexistent column triggered intense backlash, including threats against me and my family (definitely not true), forcing me and my newspaper to publish anonymously for a while (again, nope), and attracting nationwide media attention (wishful thinking). It even sparked wider debates on race, Confederate heritage, and the perils of online expression. And this is the part most people miss: If this were a joke, it'd be hilarious. But it's not—it's symptomatic of a deeper, more alarming trend.

Politicians and public figures gripe incessantly about news outlets fixing errors, while tech giants prioritize AI-generated tales over verified reports, burying real sources and data. I could get sued for careless writing, but when AI spins tall tales about actual individuals, it's hailed as 'innovation.' This isn't isolated; it's widespread.

To test the waters, I searched for my colleague Kyle Whitmire alongside 'swimming.' Google's AI confirmed he's a columnist at AL.com (https://www.al.com/), which is spot on. But then it insisted he's a 10-year-old kid who led the Boaz Barracudas to a 2014 championship. That's pure nonsense—Kyle's an adult, and he's never coached a swim team. This fabrication is even wilder than imagining my wife as a Confederate beauty queen.

Sure, this might seem trivial compared to Hinton's apocalyptic forecast. But these digital lies warp our worldview and erode our hold on truth. Those tiny disclaimers under AI summaries don't cut it—they're insufficient. Over the years, Google has conditioned us to trust its top results and the snippets displayed above them. Coupled with social media giants and policymakers obscuring facts, this blurs reality and hands immense influence to a select few.

AI stands as a transformative force, enabling feats once unimaginable—like rapid problem-solving or creative generation. Yet, it disrupts education by discouraging deep reading and critical thinking, and it poses grave dangers. Consider Hinton, the Nobel Prize winner who resigned from Google to voice his warnings freely.

'In my view, the invisible hand of the market won't protect us,' he told the BBC. 'Relying solely on big corporations' profit-driven motives isn't enough to ensure safe development. Only government oversight can compel them to invest in safety research.'

We lack a solid strategy for that, and we're unlikely to develop one while AI crafts our narratives. Look around: We're banning books in libraries about LGBTQ+ topics, censoring authentic historical studies in classrooms to spare feelings, deporting migrant workers for essential jobs, and slashing funding for media that admits mistakes. Meanwhile, we ignore tech that's altering lives, fabricating histories, displacing jobs, devaluing art, and even infiltrating our armed forces. This threat dwarfs sensational rumors like immigrants eating pets—it's far more perilous than certain substances we criminalize.

You don't have to believe me; it's right there on your screen. You can't escape it, even if you try.

Before sharing this, I Googled myself once more: 'John Archibald' and 'Little Miss Confederacy.' The AI served up a wholly different yarn, describing a 2017 column I never wrote titled 'What Exactly Does the Little Miss Confederacy Pageant Celebrate?'

It claimed my piece went viral (it didn't) and ignited a nationwide furor (there was none). The irony? I've authored plenty on racism, monuments, heritage, and our romanticizing of a shameful past—just not these pieces. We're surrendering control of our personal stories.

But here's where it gets truly provocative: Could AI be seen as a double-edged sword—empowering some while silencing others? Or is it an inevitable evolution that we must embrace, even if it means sacrificing accuracy? What do you think? Is government regulation the answer, or should we trust the market to self-correct? Share your thoughts in the comments—do you agree AI's rewriting of reality is a bigger crisis than we realize, or am I overreacting? Let's discuss and debate.

If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement (https://www.advancelocal.com/advancelocalUserAgreement/user-agreement.html) and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy. (https://www.advancelocal.com/advancelocalUserAgreement/privacy-policy.html)

The Dangers of AI-Generated Fiction: Archibald's Story (2025)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Stevie Stamm

Last Updated:

Views: 6233

Rating: 5 / 5 (60 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Stevie Stamm

Birthday: 1996-06-22

Address: Apt. 419 4200 Sipes Estate, East Delmerview, WY 05617

Phone: +342332224300

Job: Future Advertising Analyst

Hobby: Leather crafting, Puzzles, Leather crafting, scrapbook, Urban exploration, Cabaret, Skateboarding

Introduction: My name is Stevie Stamm, I am a colorful, sparkling, splendid, vast, open, hilarious, tender person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.